CONFERENCE: Beyond Neoliberalism? Politics and Punishment in Contemporary Societies (3-4 Oct 2013, Law School, University of A Coruña, Spain)

In recent years, a prominent piece of academic literature has analysed the transformations in the field of punishment through the lens of what has been called neoliberalism. Several theoretical perspectives, such as the governmentality studies, or a variety of analysis on post-welfarist punishment, have highlighted the influence of economic policies and the neoliberal mode of government on the recent evolution of penal policies.

These theoretical frameworks appear to be especially relevant to face the current challenges of the field of punishment and social control. Yet, a crucial historical event has further strengthened the interest of this sort of analysis. In effect, the study of punishment from the perspective of politics and political economy has gained momentum with the beginning of what has been termed the Great Recession. The conference is focused on this theoretical field, and it is aimed to reflect on punishment both in relation to and beyond neoliberalism.

Organization:

ECRIM, University of A Coruña, Spain (www.ecrim.es)

Academic chairs: José Ángel Brandariz (University of A Coruña, Spain), Máximo Sozzo (National University of the Litoral, Argentina)

Organizing committee chair: Patricia Faraldo (University of A Coruña, Spain)

For more information and programme, click here.

What does “security” mean in Kenya?

by Verena Brähler, September 2013

Security is a relative concept that can mean different things to different people. As part of my PhD research about human rights and organised crime in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, I spent the last three years trying to figure out what the term “security” means. Coming to Kenya for the first time in my life as part of the BALLOON KENYA programme, I was thus very curious to know how security is understood and interpreted in an African context.

I started my little research project here in Kenya by asking my Balloon Kenya colleagues what security meant to them. They responded in categories that I expected to hear, i.e. financial security and feeling safe physically. ” Security means having a sense of comfort around your physical, social and economic relations”, someone told me. Other fellows told me it meant “to be safe from bodily harm and having financial security” or “to be care-free in your daily activities”.

1269458_10151736408722933_76373777_o

This contrasts starkly with what interviewees told me in Brazil and Kenya. In Rio de Janeiro, the majority of my interview partners associated the term security with physical security (not being shot) and freedom of movement. This is understandable in a context of a city that encountered itself in an urban war between different drug trafficking factions and the state security forces. To my surprise, some of the people I talked to in Kenya responded in exactly the same way, especially those that were directly affected by the post-election violence in 2007/2008. “Security means to be free to go where I want to without being afraid”, a mobile clothes vendor from Elburgon Town told me. Jacob*, a 35-year old farmer, said security is the peaceful interaction of people from different tribes and neighbourhoods. He stated that “the livelihoods [between different tribes] have to be balanced, otherwise jealousy reigns and there can be no prospect for peace”. Jacob* who is a Kikuyu was fearful that his property could be stolen and thought there was a high likelihood that he could be killed by members of another tribe. Amina*, 35 years old, mother of three, also associated security with freedom of movement. She wished to be able to interact with anyone, regardless of their tribe: “I wish my country could be ruled by a person of any tribe, without tribalism, and that I could move around freely in my country at my one pace and without being afraid of stepping into another tribe’s territory”.

Concerns about tribalism and security dominate people’s daily conversations in Kenya. The newspapers are full of stories about ethnic violence and murder, cattle theft, corruption, bribery, road accidents, assaults, robberies and car-jacking. Molo Town – where we work with Balloon Kenya at the moment – has seen mob lynchings before, i.e. the murder or attempted murder of suspected thieves by an angry mob. Last week, our student Amina* witnessed a mob lynching in front of her house and two other people were killed by angry neighbours while trying to steal cattle. The social acceptance of violence and extra-judicial justice indicates a high mistrust in the police. In fact, some people even fear police officers, rather than seeing them as agents of protection. Some of our fellows have had the distinct displeasure, but a small bribe always does the trick.

Due to this rather negative image that I had of Kenya’s police until this moment, I figured it would be only fair to talk directly to the police and hear their view of things. I went to the nearest police station, flashed my fancy UCL research student ID and asked for an official interview. I was told I could come back another day to interview their superior, the OCPD (Officer Commanding Police Division). Of course until today I am still waiting to meet this mysterious person. However, by navigating my way through the complex hierarchical structures of the police, I have met a couple of nice police officers who were flattered to talk to me about their work (off the record of course).

They told me that police officers go through a 15-month long training and, once graduated, serve between three and five years in a given police station before they are transferred to another location. They usually live with their family in run-down houses on the police compound and earn a salary that their colleagues in Brazil would call a “salario de miseria” [misery salary]. I asked them how they evaluated their relationship with the community. Peter, originally from the Northeast of Kenya said: “Did you watch the news last night? Not a single day passes by without the police being assaulted by the public. Being a police officer is very risky. Yesterday an officer in Nakuru was almost stoned to death by two criminals resisting arrest”. I concluded that to expect the police to play their cards straight would mean to ignore the context in which they are embedded whereby government corruption and clientelism couples with poor police training, a miserable salary and outdated equipments and firearms.

Before I left the police station I was curious to know how the police evaluated the security risk for a “mzungu” working in Molo or Elburgon Town. They laughed and said there was no security risk for foreigners, “unless your hotel stages a robbery and is working together with criminals.” Fortunately, this view was shared by our Balloon Kenya fellows. Asked how satisfied they were with the security they had in the hotel and around town, most were satisfied and believed the worst that could happen was becoming the victim of opportunistic crime, like mugging, or being harassed by drunk men.

Back at our hotel at the end of a long, tiring day, I asked one of the barmen in our hotel how security could be translated to Swahili. He struggled to find an answer and called the hotel’s receptionist for help. After a heated debate, together they proposed to use the word “kusichunga” (to be wary) or “kua mwangalifu” (to be watchful). I thanked them politely and walked off wondering how it is possible that there was no word for something that I have spent three years of my life on. One hour later the receptionist came back to me: “I think I have found a good word for you”, he said proudly, “it is ‘kusalama’(to be peaceful)”.

CALL FOR APPLICATIONS: International Training in Conflict Transformation, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Kenya

Message from Susan N. Minjire, Programme Officer, Centre for Conflict Resolution, Kenya

Dear all,

Greetings from the Centre for Conflict Resolution – Kenya.  This is to let you know that CCR will be undertaking a training for parties who may be interested in furthering their skills in Conflict Management, Conflict Transformation, Early Warning and Early Response amongst others.  The training is scheduled to take place fron 2nd – 6th December; 2013 in Nairobi Kenya.

Detailed information about the course and the course modules to be covered during the 5 days training is in the documents below.

Training information: CCR-K TRAINING

Application Form: App-Form-Details-A13

The deadline for submitting the applications is on 20th November; 2013 by C.O.B.

For further clarification you can write back to us through ccrkenya@africaonline.co.ke.

Workshop: Delito y Sociedad, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina

INTRODUCCION

En los últimos 20 años se ha venido desarrollando en América Latina la investigación desde las ciencias sociales acerca del delito y el control del delito, incluyendo las instituciones estatales claves en este sentido -policía, administración de justicia penal y prisión- pero también estrategias y prácticas de control social que van más allá del estado. Dichas exploraciones han abandonado el terreno del “deber ser” en el que la cultura jurídica tradicional ubicó su propia indagación y, desde diversos campos de saber, han venido penetrando en lo que efectivamente sucede en este tejido de relaciones sociales, políticas y culturales, por lo general desde un punto de vista teórico pero también, crecientemente, desde un punto de vista empírico, alentados frecuentemente por un sentido crítico acerca del estado de cosas al respecto en las sociedades contemporáneas.

OBJETIVO

Este Workshop pretende reunir a los investigadores formados y en formación de las ciencias sociales que vienen desarrollando tareas de investigación en esta área desde las instituciones universitarias en la región para presentar los productos de sus indagaciones y avanzar en la generación de un debate académico acerca de los diversos problemas y abordajes desde un punto de vista crítico.

PRESENTACIÓN Y ACEPTACION DE PONENCIAS

Las ponencias a presentarse constituirán la materia prima de este encuentro, que contará además con conferencias de cuatro investigadores de reconocido prestigio a nivel internacional en este campo.
Las propuestas de ponencia a presentar deberán referirse a los resultados de procesos de investigación concretos, en ejecución o concluidos. En función de la cantidad de propuestas recibidas, se privilegiarán aquellas que se refieran específicamente al escenario latinoamericano e introduzcan elementos de indagación empírica. Dichas propuestas deberán tener una extensión máxima de una página, incluyendo el título, el resumen de la misma y los datos académicos básicos del autor o autores (posición académica, lugar de trabajo y correo electrónico).

La fecha límite de presentación de dichas propuestas será el día 30 de septiembre de 2013 y deberán enviarse al email:delitoysociedad@unl.edu.ar.

La aceptación de dichas propuestas será comunicada el día 15 de octubre de 2013. Las ponencias definitivas no podrán tener más de 25 páginas a espacio y medio, letra Times New Roman 12, incluyendo notas y bibliografía. Las mismas deberán ser enviadas por ese mismo medio y a la misma dirección hasta el día 15 de noviembre de 2013.

Las ponencias serán colgadas en un entorno virtual al que podrán acceder todos los participantes en el Workshop de modo que se puedan leer los materiales con anticipación. Cada panel de ponencias tendrá un investigador encargado de realizar comentarios.

GASTOS DE ALOJAMIENTO Y COMIDAS

La organización del Workshop se hará cargo de los almuerzos y cenas de los ponentes durante el evento. Un fondo está disponible para costear al menos parcialmente gastos de traslado y alojamiento. Quienes soliciten dicha cobertura parcial deberán hacerlo mediante una carta fundando dicha necesidad que debe ser enviada hasta el 15 de noviembre de 2013 al mismo email: delitoysociedad@unl.edu.ar.

PUBLICACION

Las ponencias del Workshop, luego de la revisión generada a partir de los debates en el mismo, serán publicadas. Se prevé la realización de un libro colectivo. También se explorarán otras formas de publicación.

Postdoctoral research opportunity in Sao Paulo, Brazil

Oportunidade de bolsas de Pós-Doutorado no CEPID Núcleo de Estudos da Violência

Programa: Construindo a Democracia no Dia-a-Dia: direitos humanos, violência e confiança institucional (CEPID-FAPESP)

O Núcleo de Estudos da Violência da Universidade de São Paulo está selecionando oito bolsistas de pós-doutorado para desenvolver projetos de pesquisa no referido programa, com duração de um a três anos.

O objetivo do programa de pesquisa é analisar como a legitimidade de instituições fundamentais para a democracia é construída ou comprometida, explorando os contatos entre os cidadãos e os funcionários públicos de serviços em áreas representativas na cidade de São Paulo. O estudo terá um caráter longitudinal, de modo a permitir uma compreensão aprofundada dos fenômenos e as alterações ao longo do tempo.

Espera-se que os bolsistas de pós-doutorado (PD), de áreas das ciências humanas como sociologia, ciência política, antropologia, psicologia social, estudos urbanos, direito etc., conduzam pesquisa teórica e empírica no programa, além de outras atividades regulares, como a organização de seminários, elaboração de papers, supervisão de alunos da graduação, a disseminação dos resultados da pesquisa e cooperação com os projetos educacionais.

Prazo para inscrição: 30 de setembro de 2013.

More information, click here.

CONFERENCE REPORT: ISA-PSS Joint Conference on “Security Challenges in an Evolving World”

By Susan Hoppert-Flaemig

As posted in the news section recently, blog members Susan Hoppert-Flaemig, Verena Brähler, Juan Carlos Ruiz, and Alejandra Otamendi presented a panel at the ISA-PSS Joint Conference on “Security Challenges in an Evolving World” in Budapest on 27 June 2013.

One of our motives of establishing researchingsecurity.org was the wish to create a network to share our experiences, questions, doubts, and successes as young scholars in our field. Methodological and ethical issues are certainly an important part of our research and, from our point of view, require constant debates.

We therefore proposed and realised a panel on “Researching (In)Security and Violence: Diffusion in Methodology” at the Budapest Conference. Drawing on our own field research, we used the panel to discuss topics ranging from practical aspects such as gaining field access to deeper ethical concerns about cross-cultural research:

  • Verena Brähler: Gaining and Maintaining Access when Researching on Security, Organised Crime, and Violence (based on field research in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil);
  • Susan Hoppert-Flaemig: Cultural Limits of Ethical Standards: Written Consent as an Obstacle for Research in Non-European Cultures (elaborated on the discrepancy between ethical standards at British universities and practical challenges of field research in El Salvador);
  • Juan Carlos Ruiz: Methodological challenges to study violence in Latin American excluded communities;
  • Alejandra Otamendi: Use of Secondary Quantitative Data to Study Crime and Crime Perceptions in the Case of Public Punitiveness in Buenos Aires.

The presentations can be found here.

The presentations were followed by a lively debate about obstacles and risks in researching in a vulnerable and violent environment and about the usefulness of ethical standards; and we very much appreciated the input of our discussant Edmund Pries from Wilfried Laurier University (Canada).

Having attended a number of presentations of other panels at the conference, we got the impression that a lot of security research is still being undertaken by those disciplines that traditionally dominate security research, namely political science and international relations. Within these disciplines, many projects were working with quantitative data. Contributions from other disciplines such as anthropology and sociology as well as projects working with qualitative data were less represented.

Reflecting on the implications of this, we agreed that our network is open to a diverse range of methodologies and disciplines studying security. However, we also came to the conclusion that our particular strengths are expertise in grassroots and hands-on approaches, as well as heightened awareness for the implications of our research for the communities and societies we are working with.

New pictures from Susan Flaemig’s field research in El Salvador

Security politics in El Salvador

by Susan Flaemig (2011, 2012, 2013)

These pictures were taken during my research trips to El Salvador in 2011, 2012, and 2013. Obviously, for me as a young scholar it is very difficult to get images that speak of the tremendous violence that people suffer from or that would portray state responses to violence. The main obstacle for me was the risk to carry a camera on a public bus – buses are frequent targets of robbery and assaults. Luckily, on the day I experienced an intended robbery, I didn’t have my camera with me.

Please click on the photographs for more information!

CALL FOR PAPERS: Beyond Neoliberalism. Politics and Punishment in Contemporary Societies (3-4 October 2013, A Coruña, Spain)

 

In recent years, a prominent piece of academic literature has analysed the transformations in the field of punishment through the lens of what has been called neoliberalism. Several theoretical perspectives, such as the governmentality studies, or a variety of analyses on post-welfarist punishment, have highlighted the influence of economic policies and the neoliberal mode of government on the recent evolution of penal policies.

These theoretical frameworks appear to be especially relevant to face the current challenges of the field of punishment and social control. Yet, a crucial historical event has further strengthened the interest of this sort of analysis. In effect, the study of punishment from the perspective of politics and political economy has gained momentum with the beginning of what has been termed the Great Recession. The conference is focused on this theoretical field, and it aims to reflect on punishment both in relation to and beyond neoliberalism.

Therefore, we will consider contributions on a wide range of issues that encompass the broad theme of Beyond Neoliberalism? Politics and Punishment in Contemporary Societies, particularly on the themes of:

  • Politics and Punishment
  • Political Economy of Punishment
  • Neoliberalism and Criminal Justice
  • Great Recession and penal policies

Keynote Speakers:

  • Emma Bell (University of Savoy, France)
  • Leonidas Cheliotis (University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK)
  • Lynne Haney (New York University, USA)
  • Richard Sparks (University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK)
  • Máximo Sozzo (National University of the Litoral, Argentina)

Organization:

  • ECRIM, University of A Coruña, Spain (www.ecrim.es)
  • Academic chairs: José Ángel Brandariz (University of A Coruña, Spain), Máximo Sozzo (National University of the Litoral, Argentina)
  • Organizing committee chair: Patricia Faraldo (University of A Coruña, Spain)

Abstract guidelines:

Proposals should be titled and should not exceed 250 words. Please include the proposer’s name and contact details along with their university affiliation.

Please submit abstracts via email to: dcastrolinares@gmail.com

The papers presented at the conference will be eventually published in a book containing the conference proceedings.

Closing date: 15 July 2013

Decisions about the acceptance of the papers will be made by the end of July 2013.

 

CALL FOR PAPERS: 23rd World Congress of Political Science (19-24 July 2014, Montreal, Canada)

Challenges of Contemporary Governance

Political scientists are often seen not merely as analysts of political matters, but as something akin to engineers sculpting the organisation of power.

Globalisation has profoundly altered the work of political scientists, intensifying communication and exchange on issues pertaining to the way in which communities, societies, nations and the world itself are governed.

The ambition of this international political science congress, to be held in Montreal, is to reflect upon contemporary evolutions in governance in the face of numerous challenges:

  • Political, economic and social systems have become increasingly fragmented, rendering global strategic initiatives ever more complex
  • The variety of values, attitudes and behaviours exhibited by individuals and groups makes for a greater and more diverse demand for inclusion and participation
  • As the structures through which these interests are represented continue to expand, systems of governance become increasingly complex, more difficult to interpret and understand and less responsive to the uninitiated citizen
  • There is a growing risk that the democratic quality of our political systems will deteriorate as a result of the rising influence and decision-making capacity of technical-administrative and technocratic experts
  • For a given sector or type of organisation, comparative analysis and an experimental methodological approach should help better evaluate the performance of different forms of governance
  • It may also be fruitful to focus on the various competitive strategies and means by which models of governance are promoted, or even imposed (in the name of ‘good governance’ demanded by international institutions, for example)

Faced with these challenges, the multi-faceted phenomenon of governance requires a global, comprehensive and multi-tiered approach: from the local association or political party up to the international community, via regional integration or the national regulation of an economic sector.
Adopting an approach to political science which is resolutely open to the opportunities offered by interdisciplinary collaborations, we must also support the circulation of theoretical frameworks and empirical approaches which are applicable in the northern and southern hemispheres, to the most developed nations and the panoply of emerging and developing countries.

The main focus of this congress will be to generate the greatest possible number of concrete, innovative answers to the questions of citizens, their political, associative and socio-economic representatives and the policy makers who are working constantly to improve the quality of governance.

The principal themes covered by this congress will be:

  • International Political Economy
  • International Relations
  • Public Policy Analysis and Administrative Science
  • Comparative Politics and Institutions
  • Political Theory, Gender and Politics
  • Urban and Regional Politics and Policies
  • Political Attitudes and Behaviour

For more information, please click here.

Interview with Researchingsecurity

In an interview conducted by Felicitas Röhrig, Researchingsecurity members talk about their experiences of researching security, organised crime and violence in Latin America.

The interview was published on the website of our partner organisation, the Latin American Bureau.

Latin America: Researching crime, violence and security

Latin America: Researching crime, violence and security

Published on: Sun Jun 30, 2013
Author: Felicitas Röhrig
Source: Researching Security

Researching Security is a LAB Partner organisation which has established a blog to share research interests and experience. RS members were interviewed by Felicitas Röhrig.

Researching security, violence and organised crime is fraught with methodological and ethical concerns and presents common barriers across disciplinary fields. These issues become particularly pressing for early career researchers with little experience, few connections, and scarce resources. As such, a blog entitled Researching Security (www.researchingsecurity.org) was established in 2011 by PhD students as a means through which to diffuse experiences in relation to criminal, (in)security and violence research. Not only is the platform provided useful to discuss common problems, competing methodologies and share concerns over ethics, the forum has also proved to be popular around the world – reaching a concentrated range of readers and commentators in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Mexico, the UK and the US – but also as far as Indonesia and Syria.

As in 2013, the blog has become partners with one of the leading UK Think Tanks on Latin American politics, the Latin American Bureau (www.lab.org.uk). In June 2013, some of the blog members will speak on the Joint International Conference of the Peace and Security Studies and International Studies Association (PSS-ISA), presenting and discussing field research insights and techniques with a wider audience. In anticipation of the conference, some blog members have talked about their thoughts, motivation and experiences in their field.

The recent partnership with LAB and your invitation to speak on the PSS-ISA conference in Budapest show that there is considerable demand for the information you share on the Researching Security Blog. Can you tell me what gave you the idea to create it in the first place?

Verena Brähler: Some of us got to know each other on the annual PILAS Conference at the University of Cambridge in 2011. We realised that there was a huge lack of information on how to research security, organised crime and violence. At the same time we were very motivated and eager to challenge outdated analytical frameworks on how to research these issues. That’s why we decided to create a platform for better exchange between PhD students around the world who work on similar issues. Our blog is this platform.

Please continue reading here.